Amphidiadema? similis Marheinecke, 1992, p.80-81, pl.16, figs.5-7; text-fig.14.
TYPE: Holotype: Marheinecke, 1992, pl.16, fig.7. HISTORY: Questionable assignment: Marheinecke (1992, p.80). COMMENTS: Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.24), Williams et al. (1998, p.39) considered this name to be validly published. AGE: Early-late Late Maastrichtian.
Infraspecific taxa: Go up one level. DINOFLAJ (c) 1998 |