Parascriniocassis Below, 1990, p.27.
COMMENTS: Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.490), this name is validly published since the name of the "type species" is validly published. TYPE: Below, 1990, pl.5, figs.11-15, as Parascriniocassis krumbeckii.
Species: DINOFLAJ (c) 1998 |