Leipokatium Bradford, 1975, p.3066.
COMMENTS: Harland and Reid in Harland et al. (1980, p.223) contended that this name was not validly published in Bradford (1975) since that author did not provide a Latin description. However, it is based on a fossil type and thus does not require a Latin description in order to be validly published. TYPE: Bradford, 1975, fig.8, as Leipokatium invisitatum.
Species: DINOFLAJ (c) 1998 |