Spiniferites ramosus subsp. ulcus Marheinecke, 1992, p.20, pl.2, fig.3.
TYPE: Holotype: Marheinecke, 1992, pl.2, fig.3. COMMENTS: Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.616), this name is considered validly published based on information provided by Marheinecke (1992, p.11) and the arguments of Skog and Fensome (1995, p.9). ETYMOLOGY: N.I.A. AGE: Early-Late Maastrichtian.
Infraspecific taxa: Go up one level. DINOFLAJ (c) 1998 |